August 21st, 2009 — 11:54pm
The day was sunny and bright, and I was relaxing on the porch of a close friend when I overheard a conversation by two contractors working on a property for a local landlord.
“Ray doesn’t know business. He doesn’t know the business I am trying to build. He is one of those HR types that runs background checks and specializes in recruiting. But he knows nothing about shipping, distribution, required freight costs and packaging. Let’s not even talk about working with suppliers.”
I nearly fell out of my chair and I looked at my friend who just stared at me as to say, “What is with you?” Breaking the silence, I asked him, “Did you catch that?” Returning my stare with a matter-of-fact smile, he stated, “Yeah, that’s the perception of HR on my job.”
But for me it wasn’t that simple. There stood two guys that had a vision of starting a company; the shingle based contracting business was only the beginning. Yet even more surprising, they expressed an opinion of my passion and livelihood that is shared by perhaps many others – more than I (or we) probably like to admit.
That casual comment has been on my mind now for almost two weeks with the words, “Ray doesn’t know the business” echoing in my head. A statement so easily accepted by my friend that he barely even acknowledged that the statement had been made. There I was with an undefined feeling that could only be described as a mixture of fury, embarrassment, and determination. The question of ”What am I and my fellow HR professionals doing to change this perception?” looped in my conscience; loops in my conscience. Continue reading »
1 comment » | HR Entreprener, HR Methodologies, HR Thoughts, Strategic HR
August 4th, 2009 — 3:11pm
Recently, I had a conversation with a group of business executives who were hired with the sole purpose of turning the business around. As we discussed the range and perceived intensity of the problems and issues, I quickly discovered that a deep understanding of the root causes that revealed a turnaround was even required was missing.
For example, one executive stated that he needed skill development/technical training. My questions to him were How much was the training going to cost? What kind of training (specifically) was needed? And, How did would he know that training being provided was effective? In particular, what led him and the organization to come to the conclusion that more training was needed: Was it market position, defect rate, employee satisfaction feedback, customer satisfaction feedback, accident rates, or lost time? Was it a combination of all of these measures – or did you even measure at all?

The second executive stated to me that he needed to have his particular SBU performance on par with the other SBU. He also stated that because his product/service line was new that he was under much scrutiny. My questions continued. How do you know that the other SBU has it right? How is your SBU performing among industry competitors (locally, nationally, internationally)? When do you know (or will you know?) you have gotten to where you need to be when two different markets are being served? Continue reading »
Comment » | HR Communication, HR Methodologies, HR Thoughts, Strategic HR, change management
April 21st, 2009 — 3:01am
When respected and known HR consultant/blogger/speaker, Jon Ingham recently wrote about the “Future of HR (more proactive support function or real driver of competitive advantage)” in his HCM blog, I immediately thought to myself – Jon makes some good points – very good points. However (not but) there are some things that HR is doing right (Note: Jon’s argument is not about what we are doing “wrong” or “right” as you will see, but instead formulates an argument of the (or what) role HR must play and how it must contribute to competitive advantage to be viewed as a key business “player” within organizations – thus my post is more of an inspiration vice a rebuttal).
In addition to what we are getting right, there are businesses that KNOW that a key differentiator from a good business (or a business at all) to a great business is to recognize, embrace, and implement key effective HR practices – that directly contribute to the bottom line.

Furthermore, businesses both large and small, make it point to focus on the bottom-line contributions that HR brings. HR Magazine (September 2006) states that “Small businesses that invest in formal employee selection, management and retention strategies see direct, quantifiable results on the bottom line.” This insightful article concludes with a powerful quote by Christopher Collins, associate professor at Cornell University and conductor of the study: “. . . we’ve proven that specific human resources strategies have a meaningful, and statistically significant impact on small business financial performance.”
One of my favorite works, “The HR Scorecard” (Becker, Huselid, Ulrich) – the almost timeless classic – unearth findings still relevant today, seven years after its publication. This formal study provided a framework for companies to implement bottom line HR strategies by highlighting the studied companies financial performance (those that got it right and those that didn’t), making the case for implementing the right mix and relevant HR strategies, which have proven to play an invaluable role in their financial success. Continue reading »
2 comments » | HR Communication, HR Goals, HR Methodologies, HR Thoughts, Strategic HR
February 2nd, 2009 — 5:49pm
As I focus on strategic human capital projects and opportunities, my mind drifts back to a moment not so long ago when I was speaking with a senior line manager thrust to lead a complex-integrated human capital transformational initiative that linked with the ” 21st century organizational vision.” During our meeting, I was explaining the importance of supporting initiatives that ranged from knowledge management implementation-improvement, diversity-inclusion strategies, competency-based job modeling, and data migration/ERP-CRM strategies to name but just a few of the processes involved. As I was speaking, this senior leader looked at me and said, “George, it’s all hibba-hobba.”
Of course I laughed it off and just thought that his analytical skill set and thought process just wanted black-and-white and binary rule set data that made it all digestible and easy for decision-making. However, as I progress through subsequent assignments and conduct interviews and conversations with other business professionals and HR leaders, I have come to realize that he had a point. Specifically, during one meeting, I sat and listened to a senior HR leader explain to me that the company’s goal was to “align the workforce to meet the strategic initiatives of strategic planning so that they could deliver on organizational objectives.” I thought to myself – huh? Are you not the face of senior leadership representing the most valued asset of the organization and that’s the answer you are providing?

Now don’t get me wrong. There is nothing wrong with being able to communicate in contemporary, relevant, common language that can be shared with other professionals internal and external to the organization. However, to explain to someone who is trying to get to ground truth (with concurrence) in such abstract terms leads to one conclusion: You have no idea what you are talking about.
Do you know what you are talking about? Can you state in concrete terms what your organizational strategic goals are where it makes sense to anyone listing. If you communicate like the example I just gave above, I will answer that question for you: You may know, but only you know that you may know. Continue reading »
1 comment » | HR Communication, HR Methodologies, Performance Management, Strategic HR, change management